Our Legal Take: Another Roosevelt Gardens Shooting Raises Security Negligence Questions

(The Florida Times-Union)

(The Florida Times-Union)

Our Legal Take: Another Roosevelt Gardens Shooting Raises Security Negligence Questions

Local News

A man was shot and injured outside the Roosevelt Gardens Apartments in Jacksonville Thursday, July 16, 2015.

According to The Florida Times-Union, the victim was shot in the back while walking along the sidewalk in the Roosevelt Gardens apartment complex, shortly before 4:00pm. The victim was transported to the hospital by a neighbor.

Police are still searching for two suspects in connection with the shooting, once again leaving residents concerned for the safety of their families. The shooting is apparently the fourth to occur on property in the last four months and the fifth since May 2014, per media reports.

Our Legal Take

The Murray Law Firm is questioning whether the alleged history of criminal activity on property is indicative of a potential pattern of security negligence and whether security measures were undertaken following the previous shootings to protect residents and deter such violence.

How did the two suspects gain entry to the property? What access-controls, such as gated entry, fencing, security patrols, and surveillance cameras, were in place and working at the time of the shooting?

What additional security precautions, if any, were implemented by the Roosevelt Gardens owner and management company following the reported prior criminal activity on property?

Generally, apartment owners are required to protect all residents and guests legally on premises from any foreseeable harm. Should the facts of this matter reveal that the Roosevelt Gardens owner or management company failed to provide adequate security to protect residents, the victim may elect to pursue a legal claim for his injuries. Under such a claim, the victim may be entitled to substantial monetary compensation for: pain and suffering; past and future medical expenses; disfigurement; and emotional distress.

Given the complexities of pursuing such a potential case, it is imperative that the victim immediately retain an experienced attorney who can ensure the preservation of any and all evidence that may support such a claim.  Based upon its prior experience in handling apartment security negligence claims, The Murray Law Firm suggests that photographs and a through, unbiased inspection of the property will need to be performed immediately, before any evidence may be repaired, damaged or destroyed.

We’ve Recovered Millions for our Clients…Contact us Now for a Free Consultation.

The Murray Law Firm has extensive and successful experience in representing victims of violence and apartment security negligence.  We offer our legal assistance, if desired.  We represent our Clients on a contingency agreement, which generally means that no fees or payments are owed until and unless we recover.  Anyone seeking further information or legal representation is encouraged to contact us via e-mail (click here) or by telephone at 888.842.1616. Consultations are free and confidential.

728x90 Justice

____________________________________________________________________

Choosing the Right Attorney

Selecting the right attorney for you or your family is highly important. You must feel confident that the attorney you hire has a complete understanding of the law applicable to your particular case, and has successful experience in handling such cases.

Important: Do not hire a lawyer who has violated the Rules of Professional Conduct!!!

You should not hire an attorney who calls you or visits you unsolicited, or anyone that contacts you directly to offer legal services. This activity is strictly prohibited by Rule 7.3 of the American Bar Association (ABA) Model Rules of Professional Conduct, which states as follows:

ABA Center for Professional ResponsibilityA LAWYER “SHALL NOT” CONTACT A PROSPECTIVE CLIENT THROUGH A “LIVE TELEPHONE” OR AN “IN-PERSON” VISIT.

– RULE 7.3, ABA MODEL RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT.

If an attorney, or someone acting on behalf of an attorney, contacts you in this manner, that attorney is in violation of this Rule. This unethical and unprofessional activity on the part of the lawyer is good sign that you should stay away. It is imperative that you are represented by an attorney who is capable of advocating for you within the confines of the law, and an attorney who fails to abide by the Rules of Professional Conduct is probably not the best fit. In fact, any such attorney should be immediately reported to the local State Bar Association. If you have been contacted in such an unsolicited manner, contact us and we’ll assist you in filing a report.