Was Security Adequate? Our Legal Take: 1 Shot in Walnut Hill Lane Apartment Robbery, Dallas

(CBSDFW)

(CBS-DFW)

Was Security Adequate? Our Legal Take: 1 Shot in Walnut Hill Lane Apartment Robbery, Dallas

Local News

A 21-year-old man was reportedly shot and injured during a robbery outside a Walnut Hill Lane apartment in Dallas Saturday night, August 29, 2015.  The Dallas Morning News has identified the apartment complex as “the Sedona Ridge Apartments in the Lake Highlands neighborhood.”

The victim was apparently walking through an apartment complex breezeway with another person when two men approached them from behind. According to CBS-DFW News, “One of the suspects put a gun to the the victim’s back and demanded his and the other person’s property.” The suspects reportedly fled after the victims complied. However, the victim apparently attempted to follow the assailants in an effort to get a description for the police. One of the suspects noticed him and opened fire, reportedly striking the victim in the stomach.

Police have allegedly captured two teenagers in connection with robbery-shooting.

Our Legal Take

While relieved the alleged gunmen are in police custody, The Murray Law Firm is questioning the level of security provided to residents and guests of the Dallas apartment complex.

  • How did the assailants gain entry to the parking lot? What property access-controls and security measures, such as gated-entry, fencing, security patrols, bright lighting, and surveillance cameras, were in place to deter crime at the time of the shooting?
  • Have any prior incidents of violence occurred on or near the property and, if so, have the  apartment complex owner and management increased security to protect residents and guests?

By law, apartment owners are required to protect all residents and guests legally on the premises from any foreseeable harm. Should the facts of this matter reveal that the apartment complex owner or management company failed to provide adequate security to protect those on its premises, the victim may elect to pursue a legal claim for his injuries. Under such a claim, the victim may be entitled to substantial compensation.

Given the complexities of pursuing a negligent security case, it is imperative that the victim retain an experienced attorney who can ensure the preservation of any and all evidence that may support such a claim.  Based upon its prior experience in handling apartment security negligence claims, The Murray Law Firm suggests that photographs and a thorough, unbiased inspection of the property will need to be performed immediately, before any evidence may be repaired, damaged or destroyed.

We’ve Recovered Millions for our Clients…Contact us Now for a Free Consultation.

Fox News Story

Recent Verdict

The Murray Law Firm has extensive and successful experience in representing victims injured on unsafe properties, including a recent $29.25 million dollar verdict.

We offer our legal assistance, if desired.  We represent our Clients on a contingency agreement, which generally means that no fees or payments are owed until and unless we recover.  Anyone seeking further information or legal representation is encouraged to contact us via e-mail (click here) or by telephone at 888.842.1616. Consultations are free and confidential.

 

728x90 Justice


 

Choosing the Right Attorney

Selecting the right attorney for you or your family is highly important. You must feel confident that the attorney you hire has a complete understanding of the law applicable to your particular case, and has successful experience in handling such cases.

Important: Do not hire a lawyer who has violated the Rules of Professional Conduct!!!

You should not hire an attorney who calls you or visits you unsolicited, or anyone that contacts you directly to offer legal services. This activity is strictly prohibited by Rule 7.3 of the American Bar Association (ABA) Model Rules of Professional Conduct, which states as follows:

ABA Center for Professional ResponsibilityA LAWYER “SHALL NOT” CONTACT A PROSPECTIVE CLIENT THROUGH A “LIVE TELEPHONE” OR AN “IN-PERSON” VISIT.

– RULE 7.3, ABA MODEL RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT.

If an attorney, or someone acting on behalf of an attorney, contacts you in this manner, that attorney is in violation of this Rule. This unethical and unprofessional activity on the part of the lawyer is good sign that you should stay away. It is imperative that you are represented by an attorney who is capable of advocating for you within the confines of the law, and an attorney who fails to abide by the Rules of Professional Conduct is probably not the best fit. In fact, any such attorney should be immediately reported to the local State Bar Association. If you have been contacted in such an unsolicited manner, contact us and we’ll assist you in filing a report.