Preventable Security Failure? Bernardo Ramirez-Ramirez Killed in Tucson Gas Station Shooting.

Bernardo Ramirez-Ramirez Killed in Tucson Gas Station Shooting.

Bernardo Ramirez-Ramirez Killed in Tucson Gas Station Shooting. (KOLD.com)

Did negligent security contribute to this shooting death and are justice and compensation available to the victim’s family? Read Our Legal Take below to find out what legal options are available.

TUCSON NEWS

Gunfire erupted Friday night, September 6, 2019 at a Tucson, Arizona gas station leaving one man dead.

As reported by KOLD.com, “[o]n Sept. 6, 2019, at approximately 10:45 p.m., officers from Operations Division West were dispatched to a report of a shooting at 2332 N. Oracle Road.”

When officers arrived, they found an adult male with signs of a gunshot wound inside the convenience store.

According to Tucson.com, “Tucson Fire paramedics transported [the victim] with life-threatening injuries to Banner University Medical Center, where he died later that night.”

The victim is identified as “Bernardo Ramirez-Ramirez, 24.”

The suspect fled the scene on foot and was not located.

OUR LEGAL TAKE

Gas Station and convenience store patrons have a right to feel safe and secure while on the premises they are visiting. The level of security provided at the property is of significance, and is a relevant consideration when analyzing whether this shooting may have been prevented.  The following questions are also important in assessing whether this incident may have been avoided:

  • Have there been prior incidents of violence on or near the property?
  • What security measures, such as monitored surveillance cameras, clear windows, and visible security personnel, were in place to deter crime and protect the victim at the time of the shooting?
  • Was there any suspicious people or activity on the property prior to the shooting?

Property owners are generally required to protect against foreseeable harm to anyone and everyone legally on the premises.  Should the investigation into this incident reveal facts that establish that the property owner or management lacked adequate security to protect its visitors, the family of Bernardo Ramirez-Ramirez may seek justice and elect to pursue legal claims and substantial compensation for his loss.  

The Murray Law Firm has extensive and successful experience in handling security negligence claims on behalf of victims and their families, and suggests that an immediate, unbiased inspection of the property will need to be performed so as to limit evidence from being altered, damaged or destroyed.  The complexities of pursuing a negligent security case are well understood by the legal team at The Murray Law Firm, and it is imperative that the family of Bernardo Ramirez-Ramirez retain a capable law firm who will work without delay to protect their interests.

OUR RESULTS: OVER $100 MILLION IN VERDICTS AND SETTLEMENTS FOR OUR CLIENTS

The Murray Law Firm has a long history of representing victims of violence and security negligence.  We have obtained over $100 Million in verdicts and settlements for our Clients, including a $29.25 million dollar verdict for a victim of an unsafe property. We offer our legal assistance, if desired.

We represent our Clients on a contingency agreement, which generally means that no fees or payments are owed until and unless we recover.  Anyone seeking further information or legal representation is encouraged to contact us via e-mail (click here) or by telephone at 888.842.1616. Consultations are free and confidential.

728x90 Justice

Click Here to Find Out How to Choose the Right Attorney

DISCLAIMERS:  The information contained in this post is from secondary sources and may therefore contain inaccuracies. We will gladly correct or remove this post upon request.  The material contained in this post is not intended to constitute legal advice. As each Client is unique, please contact us for a free consultation on your particular case.  “Contingent attorneys’ fees” refers only to those fees charged by attorneys for their legal services. Such fees are not permitted in all types of cases. Court costs and other additional expenses of legal action usually must be paid by the client.