Security Lapse? Our Legal Take: Bystanders Injured in Houston Nightclub Shootout

Joes Nightclub "Marked 'Club Fiesta' from Outside" (KHOU News)

Joes Nightclub “Marked ‘Club Fiesta’ from Outside” (KHOU News)

Security Lapse? Our Legal Take: Bystanders Injured in Houston Nightclub Shootout

Local News

A fight in the parking lot of a nightclub reportedly claimed the life of one person and left several others injured Sunday morning, February 14, 2016.

According to KHOU News, “[o]ne man was killed and four others were injured in a shootout early Sunday morning outside a club in southeast Houston” following an altercation between two groups broke out inside the nightclub and spilled out into the Winkler Drive parking lot, around 6:30am. One person apparently retrieved a pistol from his car and opened fire into the crowded parking lot. A nightclub bouncer reportedly fired back, fatally striking the gunman, per media reports. Three female bystanders were also struck and injured in the exchange of gunfire. Their conditions have not been released.  According to the news outlet, the bouncer was an employee of “Joe’s Night Club” although “[t]he club is marked ‘Club Fiesta’ from the outside.”

Our Legal Take

Nightclub patrons have a right to be safe and secure while on the premises of the establishment that they are visiting. The Murray Law Firm questions the level of security provided to patrons of the nightclub and whether this horrific shooting may have been prevented.

  • What parking lot security measures, such as surveillance cameras, bright lighting, and security patrols, were in place to protect patrons and deter crime at the time of the shooting? 
  • Were any attempts made by nightclub management or security to safely and separately escort those involved in the initial dispute from the premises? Were police called at the start of the initial altercation?

Generally, nightclub owners are required to protect all patrons legally on the premises from any foreseeable harm. Should the facts of this matter reveal that the nightclub owner or management failed to provide adequate security to protect those on its premises, the injured bystanders may elect to seek justice and pursue legal claim for their injuries.

Given the complexities of pursuing a negligent security case, it is imperative that the victims retain an experienced attorney who can ensure the preservation of any and all evidence that may support such a claim.  Based upon its prior experience in handling property security negligence claims, The Murray Law Firm suggests that photographs and a thorough, unbiased inspection of the property will need to be performed immediately, before any evidence may be repaired, damaged or destroyed.

We’ve Recovered Millions for Victims of  Nightclub Security Negligence…Contact us Now for a Free Consultation.

Headline Frame Fox News DeskThe Murray Law Firm has an extensive and successful record representing victims of violence and security negligence. We have recovered millions of dollars for our Clients, and we recently obtained a $29.25 million dollar verdict for a victim of an unsafe property. We offer our legal assistance, if desired.

We represent our Clients on a contingency agreement, which generally means that no fees or payments are owed until and unless we recover.  Anyone seeking further information or legal representation is encouraged to contact us via e-mail (click here) or by telephone at 888.842.1616. Consultations are free and confidential.

728x90 Justice


Choosing the Right Attorney

Selecting the right attorney for you or your family is highly important. You must feel confident that the attorney you hire has a complete understanding of the law applicable to your particular case, and has successful experience in handling such cases.

Important: Do not hire a lawyer who has violated the Rules of Professional Conduct!!!

You should not hire an attorney who calls you or visits you unsolicited, or anyone that contacts you directly to offer legal services. This activity is strictly prohibited by Rule 7.3 of the American Bar Association (ABA) Model Rules of Professional Conduct, which states as follows:

ABA Center for Professional ResponsibilityA LAWYER “SHALL NOT” CONTACT A PROSPECTIVE CLIENT THROUGH A “LIVE TELEPHONE” OR AN “IN-PERSON” VISIT.

– RULE 7.3, ABA MODEL RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT.

If an attorney, or someone acting on behalf of an attorney, contacts you in this manner, that attorney is in violation of this Rule. This unethical and unprofessional activity on the part of the lawyer is good sign that you should stay away. It is imperative that you are represented by an attorney who is capable of advocating for you within the confines of the law, and an attorney who fails to abide by the Rules of Professional Conduct is probably not the best fit. In fact, any such attorney should be immediately reported to the local State Bar Association. If you have been contacted in such an unsolicited manner, contact us and we’ll assist you in filing a report.

Contingency Fees Disclaimer: “Contingent attorneys’ fees refers only to those fees charged by attorneys for their legal services. Such fees are not permitted in all types of cases. Court costs and other additional expenses of legal action usually must be paid by the client.