Justice Available? Michael Christopher Clark Killed in Hayden Shooting.

Michael Christopher Clark Killed in Tipsy Pine Bar Shooting.

Michael Christopher Clark Killed in Hayden Bar Shooting. (CDApress.com)

Did negligent security contribute to this tragic loss of Michael Christopher Clark and are justice and compensation available to the victim’s  family?


A man is dead after being found shot at a Hayden, Idaho bar early Sunday morning, February 24, 2019.

According to CDApress.com, “Kootenai County Sheriff’s deputies responded to a reported shooting around 1:40 and found the victim…lying in the parking lot at Hayden Creek Plaza, outside [a local] Bar.”  KHQ.com is reporting, “two men got into an altercation earlier in the bar then went outside where the suspect…shot the victim.”  The news report states “another person in the bar retrieved the gun and detained [the suspect] until police arrived on scene.”  In a subsequent news report, KHQ.com identified the victim as “Michael “Topher” Christopher Clark.”

The suspect was arrested according to media reports.


Bar patrons have a right to feel safe and secure while on the premises. The Murray Law Firm questions the level of security provided in the bar parking lot and whether this tragedy may have been prevented.

  • Have there been prior incidents of violence on or near property?
  • Were authorities called before the argument escalated to a shooting? 
  • What security measures, such as bright parking lot lighting, surveillance cameras, and security patrols, were in place to deter crime and protect Mr. Clark at the time of the shooting?

Generally, property owners are required to protect all those legally on the premises from any foreseeable harm. Should the facts of this matter reveal that the bar or parking lot owners failed to provide adequate security to protect those on its premises, Ms. Clark’s family may seek justice and elect to pursue legal claims for their loss.

Based upon its prior successful experience in handling security negligence claims on behalf of victims and their families, The Murray Law Firm suggests that photographs and a thorough, unbiased inspection of the property will need to be performed immediately, before any evidence may be repaired, damaged or destroyed. Given the complexities of pursuing a negligent security case, it is imperative that Ms. Clark’s family retain an experienced attorney who can ensure the preservation of any and all evidence that may support such a claim.


The Murray Law Firm has an extensive and successful record representing victims and their families and security negligence.  We have obtained over $100 Million in verdicts and settlements for out Clients, including a $29.25 million dollar verdict for a victim of an unsafe property. We offer our legal assistance, if desired.

We represent our Clients on a contingency agreement, which generally means that no fees or payments are owed until and unless we recover.  Anyone seeking further information or legal representation is encouraged to contact us via e-mail (click here) or by telephone at 888.842.1616. Consultations are free and confidential.

728x90 Justice

Choosing the Right Attorney (Click Here)

DISCLAIMERS:  The information contained in this post is from secondary sources and may therefore contain inaccuracies. We will gladly correct or remove this post upon request.  The material contained in this post is not intended to constitute legal advice. As each Client is unique, please contact us for a free consultation on your particular case.  “Contingent attorneys’ fees” refers only to those fees charged by attorneys for their legal services. Such fees are not permitted in all types of cases. Court costs and other additional expenses of legal action usually must be paid by the client.