Security Failure? Northwoods Mall Shooting in North Charleston, SC Leaves Three People Injured.

Northwoods Mall Shooting in North Charleston, SC Leaves Three People Injured.

Northwoods Mall Shooting in North Charleston, SC Leaves Three People Injured. (

Did negligent security contribute to this shooting and are justice and compensation available to the victims? Read Our Legal Take below to find out what legal options are available.


Gunfire erupted Sunday afternoon, February 14, 2021 at a North Charleston, SC mall leaving three people injured.

As reported by, “police responded shortly after 1:30 p.m. to a report of a shooting” at the Northwoods Mall in North Charleston.

According to the report, “[t]hree people shot in the incident were taken to area hospitals. Two of them…suffered minor, non-life-threatening injuries, while the third victim was listed in serious condition.” is reporting, “North Charleston Police Department confirmed the suspect in Sunday’s Northwoods Mall shooting was not targeting the three victims. The incident reports lists their relationship status as “stranger” to the shooter.”

The shooting remains under investigation.


Mall patrons have a right to feel safe and secure while on the premises they are visiting. The level of security provided at the property is of significance, and is a relevant consideration when analyzing whether this shooting may have been prevented.  The following questions are also important in assessing whether this incident may have been avoided:

  • Have prior incidents of violence been reported on or near the property, and, if so, were any security measures added after any prior incidents?
  • Did the shopping center have adequate security in place at the time of the shooting?
  • What security measures, such as bright lighting, visible surveillance cameras, and security personnel, were in place to deter crime and protect the victim at the time of the shooting?

Property owners are generally required to protect against foreseeable harm to anyone and everyone legally on the premises.  Should the investigation into this incident reveal facts that establish that the property owner or management lacked adequate security to protect its visitors, the victims may seek justice and elect to pursue legal claims and substantial compensation for their injuries.

The Murray Law Firm has extensive and successful experience in handling security negligence claims on behalf of victims and their families, and suggests that an immediate, unbiased inspection of the property will need to be performed so as to limit evidence from being altered, damaged or destroyed.  The complexities of pursuing a negligent security case are well understood by the legal team at The Murray Law Firm, and it is imperative that the victim retain a capable law firm who will work without delay to protect their interests.


The Murray Law Firm has a long history of representing victims of violence and security negligence.  We have obtained over $100 Million in verdicts and settlements for our Clients, including a $29.25 million dollar verdict for a victim of an unsafe property. We offer our legal assistance, if desired.

We represent our Clients on a contingency agreement, which generally means that no fees or payments are owed until and unless we recover.  Anyone seeking further information or legal representation is encouraged to contact us via e-mail (click here) or by telephone at 888.842.1616. Consultations are free and confidential.

728x90 Justice

Click Here to Find Out How to Choose the Right Attorney

DISCLAIMERS:  The information contained in this post is from secondary sources and may therefore contain inaccuracies. We will gladly correct or remove this post upon request.  The material contained in this post is not intended to constitute legal advice. As each Client is unique, please contact us for a free consultation on your particular case.  “Contingent attorneys’ fees” refers only to those fees charged by attorneys for their legal services. Such fees are not permitted in all types of cases. Court costs and other additional expenses of legal action usually must be paid by the client.