January 15, 2026

One Person Dead After Shooting at Stadium View Apartments in Baton Rouge, LA. Security Negligence?

Stadium View Apartments Shooting, Baton Rouge: Legal Claim for Family?

We have over 25 years of experience representing victims of security failures across the United States, and we have recovered nearly $250 million dollars for our Clients. Read Our Legal Take below to find out what legal options are available to the family of the victim of the Stadium View Apartments shooting.

One Person Dead After Shooting at Stadium View Apartments in Baton Rouge, LA. (WBRZ.com)

Baton Rouge, LA NEWS – Gunfire rang out at an apartment complex Thursday morning, January 8, 2026, leaving one person dead.

As reported by WBRZ.com, “[o]ne person is dead after a shooting at an Alaska Street apartment…The East Baton Rouge Parish Coroner’s Office and Baton Rouge Police were called to the apartment near the intersection of Alaska and West Garfield streets.”

TheAdvocate.com is reporting, “[t]he shooting happened at about 8:30 a.m. at the Stadium View apartments on Alaska Street.”

The investigation is ongoing.

Potential Legal Claims for Family of Victim of the Stadium View Apartments Shooting?

OUR LEGAL TAKE

FORMER CLIENT: I had lawyers calling me, and friends telling me who I should hire…I trusted in The Murray Law Firm and I’m glad I did.

Apartment complex residents and guests have a right to feel safe and secure while on the premises they are visiting. The level of security provided at the property is of significance, and is a relevant consideration when analyzing whether this shooting may have been prevented. The following questions are also important in assessing whether this incident may have been avoided:

Have prior incidents of violence been reported on or near the property?
Was the property owner or manager aware of any suspicious activity prior to the shooting?
Were any security personnel at the property?
Were security measures added after any prior incidents?
What protocol was in place to deter crime and protect the victims at the time of the shooting?
Have authorities been to the property on prior occasions?

Property owners are generally required to protect against foreseeable harm to anyone and everyone legally on the premises. Should the investigation into this incident reveal facts that establish that the property owner or management lacked adequate security to protect its visitors, the family of the deceased victim may seek justice and elect to pursue legal claims and substantial compensation for their loss.

The Murray Law Firm has extensive and successful experience in handling security negligence claims on behalf of victims and their families, and suggests that an immediate, unbiased inspection of the property will need to be performed so as to limit evidence from being altered, damaged or destroyed. The complexities of pursuing a negligent security case are well understood by the legal team at The Murray Law Firm, and it is imperative that the family of the deceased victim retain a capable law firm who will work without delay to protect their interests.

Successful Legal Outcomes in Similar Cases.

OUR RESULTS? NEARLY $250 MILLION IN VERDICTS AND SETTLEMENTS FOR OUR CLIENTS

The Murray Law Firm has a long history of representing victims of violence and security negligence. We have obtained nearly $250 Million in verdicts and settlements for our Clients, including:

A $29.25 million dollar verdict for a victim of an unsafe property.
Settlement in excess of $10 million dollars for a victim of gun violence at an apartment complex.
Settlement in excess of $10 million dollars for a family who lost a loved one to gun violence at a commercial property.

We offer our legal assistance, if desired. We represent our Clients on a contingency agreement, which generally means that no fees or payments are owed until and unless we recover. Anyone seeking further information or legal representation is encouraged to contact us via e-mail (click here) or by telephone at 888-842-1616. You can also read similar potential cases in the Legal Take section of our site.

How to Choose and Hire the Right Attorney (Click Here)

DISCLAIMERS: The information contained in this post is from secondary sources and may therefore contain inaccuracies. We will gladly correct or remove this post upon request. The material contained in this post is not intended to constitute legal advice. As each Client is unique, please contact us for a free consultation on your particular case. “Contingent attorneys’ fees” refers only to those fees charged by attorneys for their legal services. Such fees are not permitted in all types of cases. Court costs and other additional expenses of legal action usually must be paid by the client.

January 15, 2026

Lucas Long Killed in Kansas City, MO Apartment Complex Shooting. Security Negligence?

By The Murray Law Firm

Lucas Long Shooting, Kansas City: Legal Claim for Family?

We have over 25 years of experience representing victims of security failures across the United States, and we have recovered nearly $250 million dollars for our Clients. Read Our Legal Take below to find out what legal options are available to the family of Lucas Long.

Lucas Long Killed in Kansas City, MO Apartment Complex Shooting. (Fox4KC.com)

Kansas City, MO NEWS – Gunfire rang out at an apartment complex Thursday afternoon, January 8, 2026, leaving one teen dead.

As reported by KansasCity.com, “[o]fficers with the Kansas City Police Department responded around 2:45 p.m. Jan. 8 to the 6600 block of Monroe Ave on a reported shooting. As officers were en route, the department fielded additional calls reporting the sound of gunfire in the area.”

According to the report, “[w]hen officers arrived to an apartment complex, a group of people led them to a rear parking lot, where a person was lying on the ground. He appeared to be suffering from gunshot wounds. Paramedics responded and pronounced the person dead at the scene.”

Fox4KC.com is reporting, “[o]n Wednesday, Kansas City police identified the victim as Lucas Long, a 15-year-old boy.”

The investigation is ongoing.

Potential Legal Claims for Family of Lee Earl Krogh?

OUR LEGAL TAKE

FORMER CLIENT: I had lawyers calling me, and friends telling me who I should hire…I trusted in The Murray Law Firm and I’m glad I did.

Apartment complex residents and guests have a right to feel safe and secure while on the premises they are visiting. The level of security provided at the property is of significance, and is a relevant consideration when analyzing whether this shooting may have been prevented. The following questions are also important in assessing whether this incident may have been avoided:

Have prior incidents of violence been reported on or near the property?
Was the property owner or manager aware of any suspicious activity prior to the shooting?
Were any security personnel at the property?
Were security measures added after any prior incidents?
What protocol was in place to deter crime and protect the victims at the time of the shooting?
Have authorities been to the property on prior occasions?

Property owners are generally required to protect against foreseeable harm to anyone and everyone legally on the premises. Should the investigation into this incident reveal facts that establish that the property owner or management lacked adequate security to protect its visitors, the family of Lucas Long may seek justice and elect to pursue legal claims and substantial compensation for their loss.

The Murray Law Firm has extensive and successful experience in handling security negligence claims on behalf of victims and their families, and suggests that an immediate, unbiased inspection of the property will need to be performed so as to limit evidence from being altered, damaged or destroyed. The complexities of pursuing a negligent security case are well understood by the legal team at The Murray Law Firm, and it is imperative that the family of Lucas Long retain a capable law firm who will work without delay to protect their interests.

Successful Legal Outcomes in Similar Cases.

OUR RESULTS? NEARLY $250 MILLION IN VERDICTS AND SETTLEMENTS FOR OUR CLIENTS

The Murray Law Firm has a long history of representing victims of violence and security negligence. We have obtained nearly $250 Million in verdicts and settlements for our Clients, including:

A $29.25 million dollar verdict for a victim of an unsafe property.
Settlement in excess of $10 million dollars for a victim of gun violence at an apartment complex.
Settlement in excess of $10 million dollars for a family who lost a loved one to gun violence at a commercial property.

We offer our legal assistance, if desired. We represent our Clients on a contingency agreement, which generally means that no fees or payments are owed until and unless we recover. Anyone seeking further information or legal representation is encouraged to contact us via e-mail (click here) or by telephone at 888-842-1616. You can also read similar potential cases in the Legal Take section of our site.

How to Choose and Hire the Right Attorney (Click Here)

DISCLAIMERS: The information contained in this post is from secondary sources and may therefore contain inaccuracies. We will gladly correct or remove this post upon request. The material contained in this post is not intended to constitute legal advice. As each Client is unique, please contact us for a free consultation on your particular case. “Contingent attorneys’ fees” refers only to those fees charged by attorneys for their legal services. Such fees are not permitted in all types of cases. Court costs and other additional expenses of legal action usually must be paid by the client.

January 15, 2026

Jose Fernando Partida Tragically Loses Life After Yuma, AZ Industrial Work Accident. Work Safety Negligence?

By The Murray Law Firm

Justice for Family? Jose Fernando Partida Work Accident.

We have over 25 years of experience representing victims of work accidents and safety failures across the United States, and we have recovered nearly $250 million dollars for our Clients. Read Our Legal Take below to find out what legal options are available to the family of Martin Garcia Morales.

Jose Fernando Partida Tragically Loses Life After Yuma, AZ Industrial Work Accident. (KYMA.com)

Yuma, AZ News – A man tragically lost his life after a work related incident Sunday morning, January 4, 2026.

As reported by KYMA.com, “[the accident] it happened at [an industrial plant], located in the area of E. County Eighth Street, at around 8:20 a.m.”

According to the report, a “coordinated response involving fire, law enforcement, emergency medical services, and hazardous materials teams were initiated’ due to the nature of the facility, which ‘handles regulated materials.’ This prompted the Yuma Fire Department’s Hazardous Materials Team/Technical Response Team and Onvida Health personnel to respond to the area.”

People.com is reporting, “Jose Fernando Partida, 57, was cleaning the inside of a chemical mixer at [the milling plant]. A second employee went inside, but then the machine turned on…The second employee escaped, but Partida was trapped inside.”

Per the report, “Rural Metro Fire shut the power off immediately, and after five hours and a complex rescue, first responders and a hazmat team removed Partida from the machine. He sustained several injuries, including broken ribs, a broken leg, a broken arm and bruising throughout his body. He was transported to the hospital, where he [tragically succumbed to his injuries] on Jan. 10.”

The investigation is ongoing.

Potential Legal Claims for the Family of Jose Fernando Partida?

OUR LEGAL TAKE

FORMER CLIENT: I had lawyers calling me, and friends telling me who I should hire…I trusted in The Murray Law Firm and I’m glad I did.

Employees and vendors have a right to safety and security while on the premises of a work site. The safety measures provided at the site or the malfunction of equipment may be at issue in this matter, and may be important in evaluating whether this tragic incident may have been prevented.

List of factual and legal inquires:

What safety rules were in place to prevent this type of accident?
Did any such safety features fail?
Was the tragedy a result of a catastrophic equipment malfunction?
What was the condition of any machinery/equipment involved?
Was the company or property owner aware of the potential safety risks to employees?
If equipment or machinery were involved in the incident, were any attempts made to service, recall or replace any such machinery or equipment prior to the incident?

Under workers’ compensation laws, our legal team suggests that the family of Jose Fernando Partida will most likely be entitled to significant compensation as a result of this accident. While they should be eligible for benefits under workers compensation laws, they may also hold a substantial third-party negligence claim. Based on its history and experience in representing families in workers compensation and negligence claims, The Murray Law Firm suggests that the family of Jose Fernando Partida should retain legal counsel without delay so as to ensure that all evidence connected to the incident is preserved.

Successful Legal Outcomes in Similar Cases.

OUR RESULTS: NEARLY $250 MILLION IN VERDICTS AND SETTLEMENTS FOR OUR CLIENTS

The Murray Law Firm has recovered millions of dollars for individuals who have been hurt, or families whose loved ones have been lost, in a work accident or as a consequence of an unsafe property. We have obtained nearly $250 Million in verdicts and settlements for our Clients, including a $29.25 million dollar verdict for the family of a worker who lost his life at an unsafe property as consequence of a product defect. We offer our legal assistance, if desired.

We represent our Clients on a contingency agreement, which generally means that no fees or payments are owed until and unless we recover. Anyone seeking further information or legal representation is encouraged to contact us via e-mail (click here) or by telephone at 888.842.1616. Consultations are free and confidential.

Choosing the Right Attorney (Click Here)

DISCLAIMERS: The information contained in this post is from secondary sources and may therefore contain inaccuracies. We will gladly correct or remove this post upon request. The material contained in this post is not intended to constitute legal advice. As each Client is unique, please contact us for a free consultation on your particular case. “Contingent attorneys’ fees” refers only to those fees charged by attorneys for their legal services. Such fees are not permitted in all types of cases. Court costs and other additional expenses of legal action usually must be paid by the client.