Articles Posted in Hide

By

Kelsy Vance Justus Work Accident, Greenville on October 23, 2026: What Happened? Justice for Family?

We have over 25 years of experience representing victims of work accidents and safety failures across the United States, and we have recovered over $250 million dollars for our Clients.  Read Our Legal Take below to find out what legal options are available to the family of Kelsy Vance Justus.

Walking-in-Courtroom-Work-Accidents-300x153Greenville, SC News – A man tragically lost his life after a work related incident Friday afternoon, October 23, 2026.

As reported by WSPA.com, “[a] western North Carolina man died in an industrial accident at an asphalt plant in Greenville County. The Greenville County Coroner’s Office said they responded to the [plant] on Greencove Drive just before noon Friday.”

According to the report, “the victim worked for a contract company doing maintenance on a machine at the plant. The machine is used to move asphalt from one area to another area before it’s loaded into a truck.”

FoxCarolina.com is reporting, “[t]he coroner identified the victim as 28-year-old Kelsy Vance Justus from North Carolina. The coroner’s office said Justus was pronounced dead at 11:50 a.m. According to officials,…the manner of death was ruled accidental.”

The investigation is ongoing.

Potential Legal Claims for the Family of Kelsy Vance Justus?

OUR LEGAL TAKE

Top-100-Trial-Lawyers

FORMER CLIENT: I had lawyers calling me, and friends telling me who I should hire…I trusted in The Murray Law Firm and I’m glad I did.

Employees and vendors have a right to safety and security while on the premises of a work site. The safety measures provided at the site or the malfunction of equipment may be at issue in this matter, and may be important in evaluating whether this tragic incident may have been prevented.

List of factual and legal inquires:

  1. What safety rules were in place to prevent this type of accident?
  2. Did any such safety features fail?
  3. Was the tragedy a result of a catastrophic equipment malfunction?
  4. What was the condition of any machinery/equipment involved?
  5. Was the company or property owner aware of the potential safety risks to employees?
  6. If equipment or machinery were involved in the incident, were any attempts made to service, recall or replace any such machinery or equipment prior to the incident?

Under workers’ compensation laws, our legal team suggests that the family of Kelsy Vance Justus will most likely be entitled to significant compensation as a result of this accident. While they should be eligible for benefits under workers compensation laws, they may also hold a substantial third-party negligence claim. Based on its history and experience in representing families in workers compensation and negligence claims, The Murray Law Firm suggests that the family of Kelsy Vance Justus should retain legal counsel without delay so as to ensure that all evidence connected to the incident is preserved.

Successful Legal Outcomes in Similar Cases.

OUR RESULTS: OVER $250 MILLION IN VERDICTS AND SETTLEMENTS FOR OUR CLIENTS

The Murray Law Firm has recovered millions of dollars for individuals who have been hurt, or families whose loved ones have been lost, in a work accident or as a consequence of an unsafe property. We have obtained over $250 Million in verdicts and settlements for our Clients, including a $29.25 million dollar verdict for the family of a worker who lost his life at an unsafe property as consequence of a product defect. We offer our legal assistance, if desired.

We represent our Clients on a contingency agreement, which generally means that no fees or payments are owed until and unless we recover.  Anyone seeking further information or legal representation is encouraged to contact us via e-mail (click here) or by telephone at 888.842.1616. Consultations are free and confidential.

728x90 Justice

Choosing the Right Attorney (Click Here)

DISCLAIMERS:  The information contained in this post is from secondary sources and may therefore contain inaccuracies. We will gladly correct or remove this post upon request.  The material contained in this post is not intended to constitute legal advice. As each Client is unique, please contact us for a free consultation on your particular case.  “Contingent attorneys’ fees” refers only to those fees charged by attorneys for their legal services. Such fees are not permitted in all types of cases. Court costs and other additional expenses of legal action usually must be paid by the client.

By

Legal Option for Family? Andrea Eguia Shooting on October 24, 2026: What Happened and Legal Overview.

We have over 25 years of experience representing victims of safety negligence and security failures across the United States, and we have recovered over $250 million dollars for our Clients.  Read Our Legal Take below to find out what legal options are available to the family of Andrea Eguia.

Walking-in-Courtroom-Apartment-Crime-300x152Indianapolis, IN NEWS – Gunfire rang out at an apartment complex early Saturday morning, October 24, 2026, leaving one teen girl dead.

As reported by WTHR.com, “[p]olice said around 4 a.m. on Oct. 24 officers were called to a report of a person shot in the 3600 block of Bunker Hill Drive, which is located in an apartment complex near 42nd Street and North Sherman Drive.”

WRTV.com is reporting, “[o]nce on scene, police found a teenage girl with gunshot wounds. She was taken to the hospital in critical condition, where she [was sadly unable to survive].”

According to the report, “coroners later confirmed her identity as 13-year-old Andrea Eguia.”

The investigation is ongoing.

Potential Legal Claims for Family of Andrea Eguia?

OUR LEGAL TAKE

Top-100-Trial-Lawyers

FORMER CLIENT: I had lawyers calling me, and friends telling me who I should hire…I trusted in The Murray Law Firm and I’m glad I did.

Apartment complex residents and guests have a right to feel safe and secure while on the premises they are visiting. The level of security provided at the property is of significance, and is a relevant consideration when analyzing whether this shooting may have been prevented.  The following questions are also important in assessing whether this incident may have been avoided:

  • Have prior incidents of violence been reported on or near the property?
  • Was the property owner or manager aware of any suspicious activity prior to the shooting?
  • Were any security personnel at the property?
  • Were security measures added after any prior incidents?
  • What protocol was in place to deter crime and protect the victims at the time of the shooting? 
  • Have authorities been to the property on prior occasions?

Property owners are generally required to protect against foreseeable harm to anyone and everyone legally on the premises.  Should the investigation into this incident reveal facts that establish that the property owner or management lacked adequate security to protect its visitors, the family of Andrea Eguia may seek justice and elect to pursue legal claims and substantial compensation for their loss.

The Murray Law Firm has extensive and successful experience in handling security negligence claims on behalf of victims and their families, and suggests that an immediate, unbiased inspection of the property will need to be performed so as to limit evidence from being altered, damaged or destroyed.  The complexities of pursuing a negligent security case are well understood by the legal team at The Murray Law Firm, and it is imperative that the family of Andrea Eguia retain a capable law firm who will work without delay to protect their interests.

Successful Legal Outcomes in Similar Cases.

OUR RESULTS? OVER $250 MILLION IN VERDICTS AND SETTLEMENTS FOR OUR CLIENTS

The Murray Law Firm has a long history of representing victims of violence and security negligence.  We have obtained over $250 Million in verdicts and settlements for our Clients, including:

  • A $29.25 million dollar verdict for a victim of an unsafe property.
  • Settlement in excess of $10 million dollars for a victim of gun violence at an apartment complex.
  • Settlement in excess of $10 million dollars for a family who lost a loved one to gun violence at a commercial property.

We offer our legal assistance, if desired.  We represent our Clients on a contingency agreement, which generally means that no fees or payments are owed until and unless we recover.  Anyone seeking further information or legal representation is encouraged to contact us via e-mail (click here) or by telephone at 888-842-1616. You can also read similar potential cases in the Legal Take section of our site.

728x90 Justice

How to Choose and Hire the Right Attorney (Click Here)

DISCLAIMERS:  The information contained in this post is from secondary sources and may therefore contain inaccuracies. We will gladly correct or remove this post upon request.  The material contained in this post is not intended to constitute legal advice. As each Client is unique, please contact us for a free consultation on your particular case.  “Contingent attorneys’ fees” refers only to those fees charged by attorneys for their legal services. Such fees are not permitted in all types of cases. Court costs and other additional expenses of legal action usually must be paid by the client.

By

Security Failure? Andres Guerrero Shooting in Oklahoma City on October 26, 2026: What Happened?

We have over 25 years of experience representing victims of security failures across the United States, and we have recovered over $250 million dollars for our Clients.  Read Our Legal Take below to find out what legal options are available to the family of Andres Guerrero.

Talking-to-Judge-Gun-Violence-300x152Oklahoma City, OK NEWS – Gunfire rang out Monday afternoon, October 26, 2026, claiming the life of one man.

As reported by KOCO.com, “[j]ust after 3 p.m., the Oklahoma City Police Department responded to a bank on North Pennsylvania Avenue near Northwest 122nd Street. A person reported hearing gunshots and saw someone fleeing the scene.”

News9.com is reporting, “[p]olice say Andres Guerrero was shot several times outside the bank before going inside, where officials say he died. Investigators say the shooting took place outside the bank as the suspect was attempting to rob Guerrero.”

The investigation is ongoing.

Potential Legal Claims for Family of Andres Guerrero?

OUR LEGAL TAKE

Top-100-Trial-Lawyers

FORMER CLIENT: I had lawyers calling me, and friends telling me who I should hire…I trusted in The Murray Law Firm and I’m glad I did.

Guests have a right to feel safe and secure while on the premises they are visiting. The level of security provided at the property is of significance, and is a relevant consideration when analyzing whether this shooting may have been prevented.  The following questions are also important in assessing whether this incident may have been avoided:

  • Have prior incidents of violence been reported on or near the property?
  • Was the property owner or manager aware of any suspicious activity prior to the shooting?
  • Were any security personnel at the property?
  • Were security measures added after any prior incidents?
  • What protocol was in place to deter crime and protect the victims at the time of the shooting? 
  • Have authorities been to the property on prior occasions?

Property owners are generally required to protect against foreseeable harm to anyone and everyone legally on the premises.  Should the investigation into this incident reveal facts that establish that the property owner or management lacked adequate security to protect its visitors, the family of Andres Guerrero may seek justice and elect to pursue legal claims and substantial compensation for their loss.

The Murray Law Firm has extensive and successful experience in handling security negligence claims on behalf of victims and their families, and suggests that an immediate, unbiased inspection of the property will need to be performed so as to limit evidence from being altered, damaged or destroyed.  The complexities of pursuing a negligent security case are well understood by the legal team at The Murray Law Firm, and it is imperative that the family of Andres Guerrero retain a capable law firm who will work without delay to protect their interests.

Successful Legal Outcomes in Similar Cases.

OUR RESULTS? OVER $250 MILLION IN VERDICTS AND SETTLEMENTS FOR OUR CLIENTS

The Murray Law Firm has a long history of representing victims of violence and security negligence.  We have obtained over $250 Million in verdicts and settlements for our Clients, including:

  • A $29.25 million dollar verdict for a victim of an unsafe property.
  • Settlement in excess of $10 million dollars for a victim of gun violence at an apartment complex.
  • Settlement in excess of $10 million dollars for a family who lost a loved one to gun violence at a commercial property.

We offer our legal assistance, if desired.  We represent our Clients on a contingency agreement, which generally means that no fees or payments are owed until and unless we recover.  Anyone seeking further information or legal representation is encouraged to contact us via e-mail (click here) or by telephone at 888-842-1616. You can also read similar potential cases in the Legal Take section of our site.

728x90 Justice

How to Choose and Hire the Right Attorney (Click Here)

DISCLAIMERS:  The information contained in this post is from secondary sources and may therefore contain inaccuracies. We will gladly correct or remove this post upon request.  The material contained in this post is not intended to constitute legal advice. As each Client is unique, please contact us for a free consultation on your particular case.  “Contingent attorneys’ fees” refers only to those fees charged by attorneys for their legal services. Such fees are not permitted in all types of cases. Court costs and other additional expenses of legal action usually must be paid by the client.